USA Today's report on the latest Sugar Cain news raises at least two questions, and will probably raise more if I stop long enough to think much about it.
Pizza Daddy says he makes a distinction between a settlement and an agreement. This sounds like the kind of bullshit I'd expect from Bill Clinton. Either way, if you're being falsely accused, why reach ANY kind of financial arrangement ?
Second question: Exact same situation, but substitute Barack Obama for Herman Cain. Are the right-wingers making excuses about racism, or looking for a rope ?
Added 12:06 pm, Wednesday:
Third question: If the cold, hard facts disproved the harassment allegation, wouldn't a sharp businessman like Pie Daddy have gotten them out immediately instead of pretending he didn't remember anything ?
Pizza Daddy says he makes a distinction between a settlement and an agreement. This sounds like the kind of bullshit I'd expect from Bill Clinton. Either way, if you're being falsely accused, why reach ANY kind of financial arrangement ?
Second question: Exact same situation, but substitute Barack Obama for Herman Cain. Are the right-wingers making excuses about racism, or looking for a rope ?
Added 12:06 pm, Wednesday:
Third question: If the cold, hard facts disproved the harassment allegation, wouldn't a sharp businessman like Pie Daddy have gotten them out immediately instead of pretending he didn't remember anything ?
No comments:
Post a Comment